data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3698b/3698b323c97d62634f69520511d023c1cff62438" alt="MacbookPro 2011 ATI GPU"
Macbook Pro 2011 with ATI 6750M
OpenCL GPU is 2.7X faster than Flam3.
OpenCL GPU is 3.6x faster than OpenCL CPU.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cffe8/cffe8b9c76d2499f5c347d654e0aee5002b449bb" alt="MacbookPro 2009 Nvidia GPU 9600M"
Macbook Pro 2009 with Nvidia 9600M
OpenCL GPU is 3.1X faster than Flam3.
OpenCL GPU is 4.4x faster than OpenCL CPU.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5379/b537922acf38ab83bbd007e9a005b406c61fc122" alt="Macbook Air 2011 - no GPU"
Macbook Air 2011 with no OpenCL usable GPU
Flam3 is 1.4x faster than OpenCL CPU.
Conclusions
Note that the Macbook Pro 2011 OpenCL GPU is 7.3X faster than Flam3 on a Macbook Air 2011. So, a better Mac makes a big difference in performance.
Flam3 is consistently faster than the OpenCL CPU renderer. The OpenCL density estimation algorithm is culprit here. But Flam3 is consistently slower than OpenCL GPU.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdc14/fdc14c4e7dd6d787450fb4d56d32b0c90495c3c3" alt=""